Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:05
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Mariska Hargitay will reveal past secrets, new family at 'My Mom Jayne' premiere - USA Today
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Would you respect the US with a woman as president?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Mario Kart World dev comments on why non-Mario characters aren’t included - Nintendo Everything
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
9 morning habits of people who age slower than everyone else, according to psychology - VegOut
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Qantas to close low-cost arm Jetstar Asia - CNN
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.